Last Posted: Dec 06, 2023
- Criteria for implementing artificial intelligence systems in reproductive medicine.
Enric Güell et al. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2023 - Application of non-invasive prenatal testing to 91,280 spontaneous pregnancies and 3477 pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization.
Rong Wei et al. Mol Cytogenet 2023 16(1) 25 - Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology
Z Huang et al, JAMA Network Open, April 4, 2023 - Addressing ethical issues related to prenatal diagnostic procedures.
Dan Kabonge Kaye et al. Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology 2023 9(1) 1 - A Bayesian network model for prediction of low or failed fertilization in assisted reproductive technology based on a large clinical real-world data.
Tian Tian et al. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E 2023 21(1) 8 - Development of a Model to Estimate the Optimal Number of Oocytes to Attempt to Fertilize During Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment.
Correia Katharine F B et al. JAMA network open 2023 1 (1) e2249395 - The neglected role of preimplantation genetic testing for Lynch syndrome.
Dallagiovanna Chiara et al. Reproductive biomedicine online 2022 - Global Trends in Research on Cell-Free Nucleic Acids in Obstetrics and Gynecology during 2017-2021.
Gao Wenyan et al. Journal of clinical medicine 2022 11(19) - The '-ics' of male reproduction: genomics, epigenetics, proteomics, metabolomics, and microbiomics.
Kang Caroline et al. Current opinion in urology 2022 - At age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale.
Koeck Rebekka M et al. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 2022 - A SART data cost-effectiveness analysis of planned oocyte cryopreservation versus in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy considering ideal family size.
Bakkensen Jennifer B et al. Fertility and sterility 2022 - A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach.
Doroftei Bogdan et al. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2022 12(8) - Gonadotropin receptor polymorphisms (FSHR N680S and LHCGR N312S) are not predictive of clinical outcome and live birth in assisted reproductive technology.
Pirtea Paul et al. Fertility and sterility 2022 - Intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs. conventional in vitro fertilization in patients with non-male factor infertility.
Iwamoto Aya et al. Fertility and sterility 2022 - Comparison of predictive models for cumulative live birth rate after treatment with ART.
Bardet Léna et al. Reproductive biomedicine online 2022 - Preimplantation Genetic Testing: A Perceptual Study From the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Tehsin Fehmida et al. Cureus 2022 13(12) e20421 - [Preimplantation genetic testing].
Løssl Kristina et al. Ugeskrift for laeger 2021 183(48) - Perinatal health predictors using artificial intelligence: A review.
Ramakrishnan Rema et al. Women's health (London, England) 2021 1717455065211046132 - Exploring genetic counselors' use of pedigree symbols to represent assisted reproductive technology.
Lepard Tassin Tiffany et al. Journal of genetic counseling 2021 - Attitude of Nigerian obstetrician-gynecologists toward gamete donation.
Ezeome I V et al. Nigerian journal of clinical practice 2021 24(6) 896-904
More
Search Result Summary
- CDC Information (2)
- NIH Information (0)
- CDC Publications (1)
- Hot Topics Archive (13)
- COVID-19 (3)
- Human Genome Epidemiologic Studies (64)
- GWAS Studies (2)
- Genomics Precision Health (48)
- Non-Genomics Precision Health (6)
- Pathogen Advanced Molecular Detection (0)
Disclaimer: Articles listed in the Public Health Genomics and Precision Health Knowledge Base are selected by the CDC Office of Public Health Genomics to provide current awareness of the literature and news. Inclusion in the update does not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nor does it imply endorsement of the article's methods or findings. CDC and DHHS assume no responsibility for the factual accuracy of the items presented. The selection, omission, or content of items does not imply any endorsement or other position taken by CDC or DHHS. Opinion, findings and conclusions expressed by the original authors of items included in the update, or persons quoted therein, are strictly their own and are in no way meant to represent the opinion or views of CDC or DHHS. References to publications, news sources, and non-CDC Websites are provided solely for informational purposes and do not imply endorsement by CDC or DHHS.